LEGALIZE, TAX AND REGULATE ELECTRONIC
GAMING DEVICES
Key Points:
Action to legalize stand-alone EGDs
would have important benefits to the
citizens of Indiana. It would
recognize the reality that such
activity already takes place in many
venues across the state. It would
bring it under regulatory control to
ensure that the machines are operated
appropriately and fairly, and assess
taxes that would help to meet the
current fiscal challenges of state and
local governments. An EGD gaming tax
can be an important source of revenue
for the state, and the legislature
should give it serious consideration.
·
Legalization, taxation, and regulation
of stand-alone electronic gaming
devices (EGDs) present a new revenue
source for the state as well as for
local units of government, many of
which are in financial straits similar
to the state.
·
Adjusted gross revenues from EGD play
at riverboat casinos in Indiana
continue to show comfortable growth,
despite ongoing competition from the
existing, untaxed, stand-alone EGDs
that have operated for many years in
Indiana. (See Charts 1 and 2.)
·
The National Gambling Impact Study
Commission (NGISC) reported in 1999
that legalized, stand-alone EGDs were
in operation in six states.
The legislation proposed would:
·
Allow holders of permits for
on-premise consumption of alcoholic
beverages to operate EGDs on the
licensed premises.
·
Establish an appropriate rate of
taxation that ensures a positive
revenue stream to the state.
·
Use existing state commission as the
cognizant body to monitor compliance
and enforcement of gaming laws and
regulations for EGD operation.
·
Establish a maximum number of EGDs
that may be operated on the premises
of a license holder.
·
Prohibit EGDs play by minors.
·
Require that EGDs be out of sight of
minors.
·
Require that off-site EGD operations
be connected to a central
communications system to ensure proper
monitoring and to compute and bill
taxes due.
·
Thousands of Hoosier businesses, most
of them small and locally owned and
operated, would benefit from the
additional revenues that would be
generated by stand-alone EGD gaming.
PARITY WITH PRIVATE CLUBS ON PULL
TABS
Key Points:
-
We are small locally owned
responsible businesses that employ
people and pay taxes.
-
Small locally owned businesses are
at a competitive disadvantage when
pull-tabs are only legalized in
private clubs.
-
The existence of many small
locally owned businesses is being
threatened by this unfair
competition.
This is happening as
“private clubs” are increasingly
opening memberships to the general
public.
-
Making pull-tabs legal in licensed
beverage establishments is not an
expansion of gaming.
It simply levels the
playing field so that all adult
only establishments licensed to
serve alcoholic beverages can
offer the same legal entertainment
amenities to their customers.
-
Indiana has allowed largely
out-of-state owned casinos to reap
millions in profits from gaming
every month, but the state has
turned its back on the small
locally owned licensed beverage
establishments.
-
Legalized pull-tabs in all
licensed establishments would
create additional tax revenues for
the state and additional revenues
for businesses.
NO NEW TAXES
Key Points:
-
While recognizing Indiana’s
current dilemma with regard to
dwindling revenues, we would urge
that only minimal increases should
be considered, as a last resort.
State budget trimming
should take priority over
increased taxes.
-
Higher beer excise taxes should be
rejected by the legislature.
Higher beer excise taxes will hurt
those the most who can least
afford it. If higher taxes are
needed, broad-based taxes are a
better way to raise funds, and are
fairer because they don’t target
one group and will do the least
harm to the state’s economy as it
works to recover.
-
Beer taxes are high enough already:
People already pay a lot of taxes
when they drink a beer. On
average, 44% of the cost of a beer
is taxes.
-
Beer taxes cost jobs:
Making and selling beer in Indiana
directly employs 15,500 people and
results in $600 million in
economic activity. A beer excise
tax increase will cost jobs. In
1990, when the Federal beer excise
tax was raised, thousands of
people lost their jobs. Indiana
doesn’t need job losses now.
Harming local Indiana businesses
will cause job losses and, as a
result, increased costs for
welfare and unemployment
compensation.
CLOSE LOOPHOLE IN 210 PERMITS
Key Points:
-
Support legislation to close a
legal loophole involving holders
of 210 permits who were in
business prior to their location
being included in a designated
River Walk Development Area or
Historic Area. Increasingly, these
permit holders are making
application for the River Walk or
Historic Area alcoholic beverage
permit.
Once they obtain this
special permit for the $750 fee,
they are selling their existing
permit on the open market for
substantial profits. This practice
puts other 210 permit holders in
the area at a significant economic
and competitive disadvantage.
QUOTA SYSTEM
Key Points:
-
ILBA opposes piece-meal granting
of licenses outside the quota
system.
-
Opposes further expansion of the
quota system.
-
Supports the continued benefits of
protecting the three-tier
alcoholic beverage system.
MANDATORY SERVER TRAINING
Key Point:
-
ILBA supports mandatory server
training and will continue working
with the ATC to insure that all
servers are properly trained.
OPPOSE STATE MANDATED SMOKING BANS
Key Points:
-
ILBA opposes legislation designed
to mandate State smoking bans in
bars and taverns.
-
ILBA continues to favor an
individual’s right to choose as it
relates to smoking preferences.
|